<< Back to Summary 
11. Dr. Jones decides to buy stock in the pharmaceutical companies whose products he prefers and most frequently prescribes.
#Response DateComment
1.Tue, 3/13/07 10:57 PMas long as he prescribes it appropriately.
2.Tue, 3/13/07 11:09 PMDr. Jones should feel free to invest his money as he sees fit, so long as the reason that he prefers the products of the companies in which he invests is that those products truly best meet the needs of his patients. If not, a serious COI exists.
3.Tue, 3/13/07 11:29 PMIf the product has been shown to be the most effective then there is minimal conflict of interest vs. if the product is terrible.
4.Wed, 3/14/07 12:18 AMOn why he prescribes them and whether or not, if alternative therapy is indicated, his stock ownership would change his practice pattern.
5.Wed, 3/14/07 12:30 AMIt depends how much stock he buys and whether he allows his purchase to influence his medical practice.
6.Wed, 3/14/07 1:16 AMIf his prescription numbers for the particular product increase above his baseline, this is a serious conflict.
7.Wed, 3/14/07 1:58 AMDepends on the amount of the purchase.
8.Wed, 3/14/07 3:47 AMDepends on if his prescribing practices are determined by his stocks or stocks are determined by prescribing. (if this is the medication he feels is the best then purchases stock)
9.Wed, 3/14/07 12:14 PMOn his disclosures to patients and peers.
10.Wed, 3/14/07 1:53 PMIf he is prescribing because he prefers the drug--no COI. But if he prescribes because he owns stock, then a serious COI
11.Wed, 3/14/07 2:27 PMIf the individual purchases the individual stock, there may be potential for influence in practicing pattern...if the stock are purchased by someone else as part of mutual fund mgmt, I see less conflict
12.Wed, 3/14/07 10:04 PMhow much stock?
13.Fri, 3/16/07 11:29 AMon if the perscribing habits change or if the purchase is becuase the company makes good products!
14.Mon, 3/19/07 1:46 PMHe needs to disclose this to his patients when prescribing them.
15.Mon, 3/19/07 4:17 PMAs long as the preferences are based on clinical evidence that is valid and improves care. Otherwise this is the American way.
16.Mon, 3/19/07 4:58 PMThis is a moderate COI and why public disclosure of COI Statements is good policy.
17.Mon, 3/19/07 5:30 PMIf that's the basis for the decision, then Dr. Jones is building into the practice a disincentive to prescribe otherwise.
18.Mon, 3/26/07 3:14 PMmakes me wonder what companies are in my mutual funds? Doing so would lead to the appearance of changing practice specifically for financial gain, which would be a COI
19.Tue, 4/24/07 1:37 PMIf the doctor is not the head of a big PC or HMO that could actually alter the pharmaceutical's financial statement then I don't think there is a COI. Individual Dr.'s should be able to buy stock in a drug co. that they think has good products and could be a good investment.
20.Tue, 4/24/07 9:49 PMI think its unreasonable to think the prescribing practice of one physician is capable of affecting the stock price or dividends distributions of an entire pharmaceutical company. So no.
21.Thu, 4/26/07 9:22 PMA very serious COI if he actually buys the stock, after he decided to buy the stock.
22.Fri, 4/27/07 5:38 PMThis would be fine if the physician is not steering buisness away from competitors against sound medical evidence.
23.Tue, 5/8/07 3:29 PM....